One school shooting you WON’T see on the national stage or in the media.

The best way to deal with a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun.


So why won’t the media give praise to this officer, when they are more than willing to condemn gun owners for one persons actions when it isn’t stopped quickly?

Once again I disagree with Ultra-Violet

Okay I get a ton of politically charged email. Some I agree with and others that I don’t.

That should not be too different form anyone else, but what may be very different, is that I give you the whole damn thing even though I am opposed to it, since I want to discuss it AND you may even want to sign their petition.


I will continue after the direct text from their email:

The Washington Post has a big problem and his name is Richard Cohen.

Richard Cohen is a syndicated columnist for the paper and has been a Pulitzer Prize finalist four times.

In July, he wrote a column justifying the racial profiling that led to the murder of unarmed Trayvon Martin.1 In September, he blamed Miley Cyrus and the MTV Video Music Awards for “so-called Steubenville rape,” adding that the issue in Steubenville was less about criminality and more about “decency.”2

Now he’s gone too far–way, way too far–again. Yesterday he wrote a column suggesting that interracial marriage is offensive to many Americans and makes them want to “gag.”

His op-ed is going viral and people everywhere are outraged. The New York Observer calls it a “horribly racist” column.3 Newsweek calls him a “menace to readers.”4 Calls for him to be axed are growing.”

Enough. Racism, sexism and victim blaming have no place in our discourse. This isn’t a one-time mistake from Cohen–it follows a long history of deeply offensive rhetoric. And The Washington Post needs to know that this time, we’re not letting them sweep it under the rug.

Can you sign the petition to The Washington Post to fire Richard Cohen?

Here’s the full quote:

People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York — a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio’s wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?)5

Equality at a higher frequency is our guiding principle, and we’re gagging at the thought that a respected publication like the Post, on which millions of people depend for news and opinion, keeps publishing this guy’s columns. His long history also includes:

  • Being reprimanded for inappropriate behavior and moved to a different office 12 floors higher by the Post over his harassment of a 23-year-old female co-worker, including telling her to “stand up and turn around” and that she “looked good in black.6
  • And after he defended rapist Roman Polanski, writing, “There is no doubt also that after all these years there is something stale about the case, not to mention a ‘victim,’ Samantha Geimer” and “[Polanski] ran from the prospect of a judge who was going to make his reputation at Polanski’s expense and send him to jail for a very long time. I would have done the same.7

The growing stain on the Post that is Richard Cohen won’t change his views, because the Post keeps publishing them. So it’s time for us to take a stand.’s Jeff Bezos recently bought the newspaper and is looking for ways to improve it. Now’s our chance to make it clear that readers will continue to leave unless Cohen is fired. Too many of his columns spew sexism and racism that justify and legitimize the culture that we’re fighting to change. Rape and racism culture is about more than just the perpretators–now’s our chance to do something about the enablers. The Washington Post needs to do the right thing, and cut Cohen loose

Sign the petition to tell The Washington Post: Fire Richard Cohen, once and for all.

–Nita, Shaunna, Kat, Karin, Malinda, Adam, and Gabriela, the UltraViolet team


1. Racism vs. reality, July 15, 2013, The Washington Post.

2. Miley Cyrus, Steubenville and teen culture run amok, September 2, 2013, The Washington Post.

3. Richard Cohen Pens Horribly Racist Washington Post Column, November 12, 2013, New York Observer.

4. Menace 2 Readers: Richard Cohen’s Latest Indelicacy, November 12, 2013, Newsweek.

5. Christie’s tea party problem, November 12, 2013, The Washington Post.

6. Washington Post Scolds Richard Cohen for Crude Talk With Female Aide, May 11, 1998, New York Observer.

7. Thank you, Switzerland, for freeing Polanski, July 13, 2010, The Washington Post.


Okay, regardless of where I stand on the issue, the guy is an OP/ED writer.

Just like me, he write opinions, he just happens to get paid for it and has FAR more readers than I do.

He is also in America where he has the right to have controversial opinions and share them.

If you are in favor of him losing his job, then by all means, join Ultra-Violet’s cause.


Our discussion point: Do you really want your op/ed writers to have to write only PC pablum, or do you want to allow them to stretch a bit? Maybe they can play the Devil’s Advocate as I do from time to time.

IRS claims it can read your e-mail without a warrant

Anyone for a forth amendment discussion? Does, or should, the government have the right to peruse individual’s e-mail accounts, and chat history, without cause or a warrant?

If they are allowed to continue this practice, how long before corporations are given the same “rights”?


By, Eyes_Open

And we’re on to our next challenge!

By Eyes_Open

Seems North Korea is at it again.


And I will reiterate the last paragraph;
When an unstable communist dictator openly threatens to nuke you, what is the proper response. I’m especially interested in the opinion of left-wingers who reflexively dismiss any sort of aggressive response as only making the situation worse. Fine. What would you do? Pay them a king’s ransom? Ignore them and pray they’re not serious? Go to the Chinese (you might want to bring some money, since we owe them a little) and ask them to get the kid under control?


Being moderate, I try to steer away from total destruction. And I’d like to see us (the US) get out of other countries’ business, but this time it is a direct threat on us. We invaded the middle east because of an indirect threat, what will we do to counter this direct threat?

Publication of a Gun/Gun Permit map?

What makes a publication think that they will get away with publishing a map of gun permits or gun transactions?

Oh wait, I know what it is, it is money. It is the fact that they don’t give a flying fuck about the people, they care about ratings.

Think of how much you would like it if your neighbor put up a sign that let the world know that you do not have weapons in your home, but they do.

Would that make you feel nice and secure? Why give the criminals a clue as to what houses to burgle and which to leave alone.

Do you want to see how fast the gun owners will reports their weapons stolen, or sold?


Should this FOIA request been denied? Other jurisdictions said that it was not in the public’s best interest to have access to this information.


What is it with the NYPD?

Why do they feel that they can yank people from the sidewalk and into the street to arrest them. If they were on the sidewalk peacefully protesting, then leave them be. When they choose to protest in the middle of an intersection without a parade permit, then take action.

Why do they feel that they do not answer to the people?

We expect that the press can do their job observing in a peaceful manner without getting locked up.

The police should not be forming a human wall to prevent coverage by the media as to what is going on. What are they hiding?

The NYPD (or any other police department) does not get to dictate what is news. The press makes that choice. Granted, we often get fluff n stuff, but there are reporters who are trying to find gold in what goes on around us.

I think that the Occupy movement scared the shit out of them (and our federal government) and they were/are doing anything that they can and want to get it quashed.